We are born. But not all who are born grow up, not everyone is healthy, not everyone is perfect. We all have our human condition. I would almost say that much of our being is determined at birth. But when we are young, we can significantly change the appearance of what we really are. As we get older we change less and less. I think that despite the changes that occur in our youth, the essence of who we are (physically and mentally), and what we become, is already defined, in large part, when we were born, I feel it was so with me. What happens is that in our youth, and as time passes and we know ourselves better, according to environmental influence, we tend to reinforce or not, that for which our body -as a whole physical and psychically - drives us. If we reinforce that we are at birth and continuously, then, as examples: 1) We will strengthen the introversion and characteristics that are accompanied with the introversion that we are born with, such as the weak capacity of socialization, being reserved, and focus on solitary activities ; or, 2) We will strengthen the extroversion and certain features that ship with that original feature, which will cause, if the environment is conducive, he will be a very sociable person, to focus on activities together, it will like immensely to be the center of attention, facing the outside world to himself. If you do not continually reinforce what we are at birth, according to the influence of the environment around us, then we are among the opposite and extreme examples that I gave above (point 1 and point 2), there is a normal practice, a medium to which every human being tends. With this puts the question of which of the two factors is more prevalent in the lives of every being: -a)-The determinism - one day we will be those for which we had been designed and we will act according to our bodies (physically and psychically) in all our lives, we walk where we walk, we do what we do; -b) or the environment that surrounds being, as it develops, is the main cause of what we are throughout our lives? -. I would say that we cannot exclude the joint action of each of these two factors, comprehensive of what we are, and this should be consensual, even if it is not. Between the extremes of the characteristics '1) 'and '2)', there is a huge majority of normal people who cover a large part of this whole spectrum of extremes. The way the two factors acting general determinism - genes and the organism as a system in general - and 'b' environment) in every person's life is enormously complex. I feel in me this complexity. I know me, I was born, reinforced and solidified (mental and physical) characteristics of which I got not rid of, although I could see they were not and are not to be adequate for my survival. However, I still survive. But the central issue, which is divided, and which makes me write these lines earlier is: can or cannot we become very different to what we were organically programmed at birth by genes and by our whole being (?), generally Already embryonically formed, leaving us just grow up (?) and adapt to the environment according to what we are? I have thought about it. Personally, from what I know me (and I well know me), I know I would not change much if the course of my life had been different, or if I had followed another path, I know I will be, basically, the same forever. And I know I could have lost myself in the misunderstanding of what I am, in ignorance of my roots, my parents, with whom I identify and with whom I compare what I feel like being very similar, and yet I know that many people is lost by the motive of not understand why they are as they are, not knowing their parentage. It is clear that many people thrive in life despite not knowing their history, or perhaps because of this, but never a general rule, as I always say. I feel that in me, the genetic factor has weighed more heavily in my life and keeps weighing, in my being as a organism, and has generally conditioned on my action. I know there are cases of people who give back 'over' to the characteristics and retraction force, which for many is brutal, and are transfigured in this life, from 'ugly ducklings' to slender figures, and / or beings look silly and / or low intelligence and who triumph and become cognizant of how to win, just winning, from unfortunate persons to lucky persons. And when I think these cases I also think, again, I have been a clear notion that there are general laws that guide the psyche of mankind in interaction with the environment, such that you could generalize that the fact that some human beings change enormously, in life, you can do either. But not. The whole of the two factors (organic- genetic - determinants - and the ambience that surroundings the individual) that I mean and who act in the life of each individual in particular is very specific to each individual in cultural time in which it is. As well as the psycho-physiological characteristics of a man who would be positive in a given cultural environment of a given time and context may be maladjusted in other cultural environments and / or another time. We live in a different world from the past, there is a global cultural awareness, due to existing means of communication, and the culture that governs men today, especially in democratic and free expression countries, which contains the principle of tolerance in beings who are different and / or express themselves differently, protecting them immense, ie: the disabled, the sick, the uglier, those who have an opinion and a different mindset than normal, and I say it too, those who have a different sexual orientation, the thugs who often act due to human conditions, particularly, that there are in them, among other examples. I know in history as in life today, so I read and from what I see, and feel that it is highly likely, the atrocities that man commits to each other, and too often in the best of intentions, such as, cure or help one person, but, doing harm. I feel the pain of who was and is, over time, marginalized, mistreated and often paying with their lives an empty existence, eternally waiting for something to save them, by a God. I feel the injustice that those who cannot defend themselves, which are given as crazy, sick patients, unlucky patients of a Frankenstein, or even those who are different and they weigh about the pain of a dull life that cannot understand and have a chance of having an existential continuity acceptable. Life in this world is complex, even better said, it is strange, very strange. Maybe even every being has his human condition, it is not for anyone else to understand.
I would not be here talking about today - perhaps to nobody - if not for this profound transformation in the way of communicating, the Internet, which allows me, being who I am - a being who had to follow the path of introspection and isolation and that cannot socialize in a normal way due to genetic and environmental factors - be linked to the social world and in contact with people, and it freed me. It freed me from depression for example, the isolation that I would be voted on and even an uncontrollable madness if I was at home without the feedback of the world, besides it made me know myself much better and the world around me. I know and feel that the way to relate to people is changing with the internet, with social networks to be a way to socialize people. Of course for many people is more a way of life and living and relating, the internet, but for many others is the only medium where they can be free and feel normal. I really think the world is with even more individualistic characteristics demarcated, with the advent of the internet, which everyone wants to have access. The change of mentality is to be enormous. I still think that loneliness is decreased, despite the distance that people create between them, which are more hooked on the technology, and privileging internet the expense of social contact 'in situ'. But it sure is difficult to assess the effect of an influence, as is the internet, in people. Each person is different, every case is different, each person is unique and has its own way of feeling, its own way of interpreting the world. Each person is a human condition.
I would not be here talking about today - perhaps to nobody - if not for this profound transformation in the way of communicating, the Internet, which allows me, being who I am - a being who had to follow the path of introspection and isolation and that cannot socialize in a normal way due to genetic and environmental factors - be linked to the social world and in contact with people, and it freed me. It freed me from depression for example, the isolation that I would be voted on and even an uncontrollable madness if I was at home without the feedback of the world, besides it made me know myself much better and the world around me. I know and feel that the way to relate to people is changing with the internet, with social networks to be a way to socialize people. Of course for many people is more a way of life and living and relating, the internet, but for many others is the only medium where they can be free and feel normal. I really think the world is with even more individualistic characteristics demarcated, with the advent of the internet, which everyone wants to have access. The change of mentality is to be enormous. I still think that loneliness is decreased, despite the distance that people create between them, which are more hooked on the technology, and privileging internet the expense of social contact 'in situ'. But it sure is difficult to assess the effect of an influence, as is the internet, in people. Each person is different, every case is different, each person is unique and has its own way of feeling, its own way of interpreting the world. Each person is a human condition.
